From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
Cc: "Nadav Har'El" <nyh@math.technion.ac.il>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>,
abelg@il.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] nEPT: MMU context for nested EPT
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:25:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC0D081.4020106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EC00BC1.7000101@redhat.com>
On 11/13/2011 08:26 PM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
> >
> >> int kvm_mmu_get_spte_hierarchy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 sptes[4]);
> >> void kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask(u64 mmio_mask);
> >> int handle_mmio_page_fault_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, bool direct);
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> >> index 507e2b8..70d4cfd 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> >> @@ -39,6 +39,21 @@
> >> #define CMPXCHG cmpxchg64
> >> #define PT_MAX_FULL_LEVELS 2
> >> #endif
> >> +#elif PTTYPE == EPT
> >> + #define pt_element_t u64
> >> + #define FNAME(name) EPT_##name
> >> + #define PT_BASE_ADDR_MASK PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK
> >> + #define PT_LVL_ADDR_MASK(lvl) PT64_LVL_ADDR_MASK(lvl)
> >> + #define PT_LVL_OFFSET_MASK(lvl) PT64_LVL_OFFSET_MASK(lvl)
> >> + #define PT_INDEX(addr, level) PT64_INDEX(addr, level)
> >> + #define PT_LEVEL_BITS PT64_LEVEL_BITS
> >> + #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> >> + #define PT_MAX_FULL_LEVELS 4
> >> + #define CMPXCHG cmpxchg
> >> + #else
> >> + #define CMPXCHG cmpxchg64
> >> + #define PT_MAX_FULL_LEVELS 2
> >> + #endif
> >
> > The various masks should be defined here, to avoid lots of #ifdefs later.
> >
>
> That what I did first but than I was afraid that the MASK will be changed for mmu.c too.
> so I decided on ifdefs.
> The more I think about it I think we need rapper function for mask checking (at least for this file).
> What do you think ?
Either should work, as long as the main logic is clean.
> >> for (;;) {
> >> gfn_t real_gfn;
> >> @@ -186,9 +215,14 @@ retry_walk:
> >> pte_gpa = gfn_to_gpa(table_gfn) + offset;
> >> walker->table_gfn[walker->level - 1] = table_gfn;
> >> walker->pte_gpa[walker->level - 1] = pte_gpa;
> >> -
> >> +#if PTTYPE == EPT
> >> + real_gfn = mmu->translate_gpa(vcpu, gfn_to_gpa(table_gfn),
> >> + EPT_WRITABLE_MASK);
> >> +#else
> >> real_gfn = mmu->translate_gpa(vcpu, gfn_to_gpa(table_gfn),
> >> PFERR_USER_MASK|PFERR_WRITE_MASK);
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >
> > Unneeded, I think.
>
> Is it because translate_nested_gpa always set USER_MASK ?
Yes... maybe that function needs to do something like
access |= mmu->default_access;
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-14 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-10 9:57 [PATCH 0/10] nEPT: Nested EPT support for Nested VMX Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 9:58 ` [PATCH 01/10] nEPT: Module option Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 12:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 14:21 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 14:38 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 15:14 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 15:21 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:58 ` [PATCH 02/10] nEPT: MMU context for nested EPT Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 10:31 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 12:49 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 14:40 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 15:19 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 20:05 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-11-12 10:39 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-12 21:37 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-11-13 9:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-13 11:30 ` Orit Wasserman
2011-11-13 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-13 18:26 ` Orit Wasserman
2011-11-14 8:25 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-12-08 15:21 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-12-06 12:40 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-12-06 13:07 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-23 15:06 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-11-23 15:44 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-11-24 13:36 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-07 9:06 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-12-07 10:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 9:59 ` [PATCH 03/10] nEPT: Fix cr3 handling in nested exit and entry Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 9:59 ` [PATCH 04/10] nEPT: Fix page table format in nested EPT Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 10:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 11:03 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 12:21 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 12:50 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 13:07 ` Orit Wasserman
2011-11-10 10:00 ` [PATCH 05/10] nEPT: Fix wrong test in kvm_set_cr3 Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 10:00 ` [PATCH 06/10] nEPT: Some additional comments Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 10:01 ` [PATCH 07/10] nEPT: Advertise EPT to L1 Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 10:01 ` [PATCH 08/10] nEPT: Nested INVEPT Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 12:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-11 14:24 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-12-11 14:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] nEPT: Documentation Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] nEPT: Miscelleneous cleanups Nadav Har'El
2011-11-10 12:26 ` [PATCH 0/10] nEPT: Nested EPT support for Nested VMX Avi Kivity
2011-11-13 8:52 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-11-13 9:21 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-12 11:37 ` Nadav Har'El
2011-12-12 13:04 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC0D081.4020106@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
--cc=abelg@il.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nyh@math.technion.ac.il \
--cc=owasserm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).