From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] kvm-s390 patches
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:35:54 +0200
Message-ID: <4EC4E38A.5000202@redhat.com>
References: <20111117100040.458397238@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tossati <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53160 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755511Ab1KQKgA (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Nov 2011 05:36:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20111117100040.458397238@de.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 11/17/2011 12:00 PM, Carsten Otte wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> these patches are bugfixes for kvm on s390. Could you please apply
> them?
>

All applied, thanks.  Patch 2 had rejects (you didn't have the diagnose
0x10 patch in your tree), it should be good, but please double check
kvm.git next.

Should all four patches go to 3.2?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function