From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Otte Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] [PATCH] kvm-s390: pseudo page fault support Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:50:48 +0100 Message-ID: <4EC51F48.3090104@de.ibm.com> References: <20111117111954.130341385@de.ibm.com> <20111117112248.205248622@de.ibm.com> <4EC5098B.70101@redhat.com> <4EC50E5F.6040202@de.ibm.com> <4EC517AB.4070300@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tossati , borntrae@linux.vnet.ibm.com, heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com, huckc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, KVM To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([194.196.100.163]:39654 "EHLO mtagate3.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757634Ab1KQOvN (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:51:13 -0500 Received: from d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.129]) by mtagate3.uk.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id pAHEpC92030516 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:51:12 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id pAHEpBXC2375696 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:51:12 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id pAHEpBBn025610 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:51:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4EC517AB.4070300@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 17.11.2011 15:18, Avi Kivity wrote: > Backports to distros, even if you happened to name my favourite, do not > override upstream considerations. "as soon as we find time" doesn't > inspire confidence either. If async_pf.c is better, let's do that (btw > async_pf.c did not find itself in generic code by accident). That makes sense to me.