From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: introduce kvm_for_each_memslot macro Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 13:21:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4EC8E2D3.1080804@redhat.com> References: <4EC6226B.3080408@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4EC622F8.30005@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , KVM To: Xiao Guangrong Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26357 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753069Ab1KTLWA (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Nov 2011 06:22:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4EC622F8.30005@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/18/2011 11:18 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > index bb8728e..10524c0 100644 > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > @@ -307,6 +307,10 @@ static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int i) > (vcpup = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, idx)) != NULL; \ > idx++) > > +#define kvm_for_each_memslot(slots, memslot, i) \ > + for (i = 0; i < (slots)->nmemslots && \ > + ({ memslot = &(slots)->memslots[i]; 1; }); i++) > + > Statement expression not needed, you can use the comma operator: i < (slots)->nmemslots && (memslot = @(slots)->memslots[i], true) or even memslot = &(slots)->memslots[i], i < (slots)->nmemslots or just kill i and make memslot the loop variable. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function