From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for November 29 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:38:48 -0600 Message-ID: <4ED63FF8.2040101@codemonkey.ws> References: <8762i3nczx.fsf@trasno.mitica> <4ED50F7C.2040903@redhat.com> <4ED563E7.3040508@codemonkey.ws> <20111130092237.GB24074@garlic> <20111130095456.GE28621@redhat.com> <4ED63596.6090303@codemonkey.ws> <20111130143523.GC19650@garlic.tlv.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Daniel P. Berrange" , Avi Kivity , quintela@redhat.com, Developers qemu-devel , KVM devel mailing list Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:42156 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755571Ab1K3Oiw (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:38:52 -0500 Received: by ghrr1 with SMTP id r1so670049ghr.19 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 06:38:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111130143523.GC19650@garlic.tlv.redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/30/2011 08:35 AM, Alon Levy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:54:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > [snip] >> But the way we're structuring QOM, we could do very simple bindings >> that just used introspection (much like GObject does). > > Is this the current tree? > http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori.git/tree/refs/heads/qom That's the end goal, more or less. The current submission tree is: https://github.com/aliguori/qemu/tree/qom-upstream.4 I just need to rebase and send those out. Regards, Anthony Liguroi > >> >> The vast majority of work is fitting everything into an object >> model. Doing the bindings is actually fairly simple. >> >> Regards, >> >> Anthony Liguori >> > [snip] >