From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: winXP "Standard PC" HAL and qemu-kvm >= 0.15 Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:45:07 +0100 Message-ID: <4EDE54A3.9050901@siemens.com> References: <4EDC8D06.20308@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4EDCC6FE.8040702@redhat.com> <4EDD2763.8010808@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4EDDEF26.9030403@redhat.com> <4EDDF659.6040701@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20111206122752.GA31385@redhat.com> <4EDE2AA0.7090001@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4EDE42EB.2020101@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4EDE450B.6090801@siemens.com> <4EDE498A.2040309@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Isaku Yamahata , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , KVM list , Avi Kivity To: Michael Tokarev Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4EDE498A.2040309@msgid.tls.msk.ru> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 2011-12-06 17:57, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 06.12.2011 20:38, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2011-12-06 17:29, Michael Tokarev wrote: > [] >>> It appears there are two issues here, one is fixed by >>> 09de0f469c3c2a277c7874f6c60992c8b94719a9 and is 32bit-only, and >>> another bisect leads to this commit: > > Or 3... :) > >>> commit 59539c913383fdd3350681301b44f02fa7ee2757 >>> Author: Jan Kiszka >>> Date: Mon Jun 27 12:22:28 2011 +0200 >>> >>> qemu-kvm: Fix in-kernel PIC reset > > [] >>> Anything wrong with this patch? >> >> I tend to say "no". It may just reveals some issue elsewhere. >> >> To cross-check: Does this series [1] expose the same issue with vanilla >> QEMU when enabling that in-kernel irqchip version? > > I cross-checked it the other way, which really should have been done > at the very beginning instead of wasting so much time of so many > people at once. I just tried qemu-kvm-1.0, which I wasn't due to > an unrelated issue (1.0 does not work for me in my funky 32/64bit > environment). Also, since the bug has been reported especially > against 0.15 version (triggering by upgrading from 0.14 to 0.15), > I didn't insist on trying 1.0, which was my biggest mistake. > > And in qemu-kvm-1.0, the problem guest Just Works. So i t must be > something else which were fixed between 0.15 and 1.0. > > Upstream qemu 1.0 does not have this issue too. Good. Would still make sense to find this change for -stable. > >> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/82871 > > I'll try to verify this series in a moment, but hopefully it will work > fine too :) TIA, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux