From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Asias He <asias.hejun@gmail.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] kvm tools: Add initial SPAPR PPC64 architecture support
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:54:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDE64D7.7020809@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLGSL=sqfm4WrMY5Mrs8+M0=L0BDcmjYnRyeHaoR6zTHrg@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/06/2011 12:33 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
>> I'm seeing a lot of double-underscores -- is this common style in KVM
>> tool? It's reserved for use by the compiler and system library. It's
>> common in the kernel (though not used like this for namespace
>> prefixes), but there's no system library involved there.
>
> Yes, they are KVM tool coding style which we took from perf. Double
> underscore _prefixes_ are reserved in userspace but there's no reason
> we can't use them in identifiers like we do.
OK, it looks like it's just C++ that also reserves non-leading double
underscores -- sorry about that.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1323143103.git.matt@ozlabs.org>
2011-12-06 4:05 ` [PATCH 1/8] kvm tools: Add initial SPAPR PPC64 architecture support Matt Evans
2011-12-06 18:03 ` Scott Wood
2011-12-06 18:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-12-06 18:54 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2011-12-07 7:35 ` Matt Evans
2011-12-07 18:31 ` Scott Wood
2011-12-08 2:57 ` Matt Evans
2011-12-06 4:06 ` [PATCH 2/8] kvm tools: Generate SPAPR PPC64 guest device tree Matt Evans
2011-12-06 4:06 ` [PATCH 3/8] kvm tools: Add SPAPR PPC64 hcall & rtascall structure Matt Evans
2011-12-06 4:06 ` [PATCH 4/8] kvm tools: Add SPAPR PPC64 HV console Matt Evans
2011-12-06 4:06 ` [PATCH 5/8] kvm tools: Add PPC64 XICS interrupt controller support Matt Evans
2011-12-06 4:06 ` [PATCH 6/8] kvm tools: Add PPC64 PCI Host Bridge Matt Evans
2011-12-06 4:06 ` [PATCH 7/8] kvm tools: Add PPC64 kvm_cpu__emulate_io() Matt Evans
2011-12-06 4:06 ` [PATCH 8/8] kvm tools: Make virtio-pci's ioeventfd__add_event() fall back gracefully if ioeventfds unavailable Matt Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDE64D7.7020809@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=matt@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).