From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] kvm tools: Add initial SPAPR PPC64 architecture support Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:54:15 -0600 Message-ID: <4EDE64D7.7020809@freescale.com> References: <4EDD94A4.2080003@ozlabs.org> <4EDE58FE.4040904@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matt Evans , , , Ingo Molnar , Asias He , Sasha Levin , Cyrill Gorcunov To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 12/06/2011 12:33 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Scott Wood wrote: >> I'm seeing a lot of double-underscores -- is this common style in KVM >> tool? It's reserved for use by the compiler and system library. It's >> common in the kernel (though not used like this for namespace >> prefixes), but there's no system library involved there. > > Yes, they are KVM tool coding style which we took from perf. Double > underscore _prefixes_ are reserved in userspace but there's no reason > we can't use them in identifiers like we do. OK, it looks like it's just C++ that also reserves non-leading double underscores -- sorry about that. -Scott