From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Raghavendra K T <raghukt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/4] kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor
 to support pv-ticketlocks
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:16:51 +0530
Message-ID: <4EDF987B.8040900@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20111130085921.23386.89708.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <20111130085959.23386.69166.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <20111207104849.GA24849@amt.cnet> <4EDF5413.1030107@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20111207123330.GA32212@amt.cnet> <4EDF6049.2030204@redhat.com> <20111207133947.GA1708@amt.cnet> <4EDF7DC5.5010504@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Xen <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki Poulose <
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.8]:46007 "EHLO
	e28smtp08.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758079Ab1LGQrF (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:47:05 -0500
Received: from /spool/local
	by e28smtp08.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org> from <raghukt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
	Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:17:03 +0530
In-Reply-To: <4EDF7DC5.5010504@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/07/2011 08:22 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/07/2011 03:39 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> Also I think we can keep the kicked flag in vcpu->requests, no need for
>>> new storage.
>>
>> Was going to suggest it but it violates the currently organized
>> processing of entries at the beginning of vcpu_enter_guest.
>>
>> That is, this "kicked" flag is different enough from vcpu->requests
>> processing that a separate variable seems worthwhile (even more
>> different with convertion to MP_STATE at KVM_GET_MP_STATE).
>
> IMO, it's similar to KVM_REQ_EVENT (which can also cause mpstate to
> change due to apic re-evaluation).
>

Ok, So what I understand is we have to either :
1. retain current kick flag AS-IS but would have to make it migration 
friendly. [I still have to get more familiar with migration side]
or
2. introduce notion similar to KVM_REQ_PVLOCK_KICK(??) to be part of
vcpu->requests.

So what would be better? Please let me know.