From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: PPC: align vcpu_kick with x86
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:15:34 -0600
Message-ID: <4EE25E56.3070902@freescale.com>
References: <1323444412-18482-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1323444412-18482-5-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4EE25137.4090402@freescale.com> <7C199265-906A-4173-97F1-BF51856ACFD2@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>" <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>,
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Sommer?= <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Return-path: <kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <7C199265-906A-4173-97F1-BF51856ACFD2@suse.de>
Sender: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 12/09/2011 01:10 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 09.12.2011, at 19:19, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/09/2011 09:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> Our vcpu kick implementation differs a bit from x86 which resulted in us not
>>> disabling preemption during the kick. Get it a bit closer to what x86 does.
>>
>> Disabling preemption only matters due to the other bit of functionality
>> you brought over -- avoiding kicking the current CPU.
> 
> Nope, I had BUG_ON warnings in the kick code because preemption was on.

Coming from where?

-Scott