From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [patch 04/12] [PATCH] kvm-s390-ucontrol: export SIE control block to user Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:17:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4EE5C6A6.1040400@redhat.com> References: <20111209124925.174365304@de.ibm.com> <20111209124951.744336898@de.ibm.com> <4EE34199.3090908@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Graf , Marcelo Tossati , borntrae@linux.vnet.ibm.com, heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com, huckc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, KVM , Joachim von Buttlar , Jens Freimann , Constantin Werner , Xiantao Zhang To: Carsten Otte Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55244 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751964Ab1LLJRj (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 04:17:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4EE34199.3090908@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/10/2011 01:25 PM, Carsten Otte wrote: > On 09.12.2011 17:06, Alexander Graf wrote: >> Same as this. It's an s390 specific hack, so it should be identified >> as such. > Naming is fine either way with me. Sasha Levin and Avi seemed to > prefer not to have _S390 in it. > I've reconsidered and now want the s390 back. Sorry about that. git-filter-branch can make the sedding painless. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function