From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, asias.hejun@gmail.com,
levinsasha928@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kvm tools, qcow: Add support for growing refcount blocks
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:15:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE5E24D.20300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112121257150.7537@tux.localdomain>
Am 12.12.2011 11:58, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> @@ -667,14 +722,11 @@ static struct qcow_refcount_block *qcow_read_refcount_block(struct qcow *q, u64
>>>
>>> rft_idx = clust_idx >> (header->cluster_bits - QCOW_REFCOUNT_BLOCK_SHIFT);
>>> if (rft_idx >= rft->rf_size)
>>> - return NULL;
>>> + return (void *)-ENOSPC;
>>
>> Is this allowed style in kvm-tool? :-/
>
> It needs to use ERR_PTR() and related macros but otherwise I don't see a
> big problem with it.
Can you be sure that it never clashes with a valid allocation when you
use this in userspace?
But yes, at least using appropriate functions should be required. And
this means that you can't only check for -ENOSPC, but you need to check
for all possible error codes (IS_ERR_VALUE() I guess).
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-12 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-12 2:03 [RFC PATCH] kvm tools, qcow: Add support for growing refcount blocks Lan Tianyu
2011-12-12 9:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-12-12 10:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-12-12 11:15 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2011-12-12 11:17 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-12-13 3:41 ` lan,Tianyu
2011-12-13 8:57 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-12-13 9:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-12-14 1:22 ` lan,Tianyu
2011-12-13 3:16 ` lan,Tianyu
2011-12-13 9:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-12-13 3:05 ` lan,Tianyu
2011-12-13 9:03 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE5E24D.20300@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=prasadjoshi124@gmail.com \
--cc=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).