From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Antonios Motakis Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] ARM: KVM: Support SMP hosts Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 07:15:41 +0100 Message-ID: <4EEED68D.5040307@virtualopensystems.com> References: <20111211102403.21693.6887.stgit@localhost> <20111211102529.21693.62306.stgit@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: android-virt@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc.Zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, tech@virtualopensystems.com, avi@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org To: Christoffer Dall Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:57032 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751793Ab1LSGPp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:15:45 -0500 Received: by eekc4 with SMTP id c4so5129176eek.19 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:15:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111211102529.21693.62306.stgit@localhost> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/11/2011 11:25 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > WARNING: This code is in development and guests do not fully boot on SMP > hosts yet. Hello, What would still be needed to fully booted SMP? For example, are there identified critical sections and structures that need to be worked on, or there are parts that still need to be reviewed to find those? Or is it only a matter of fixing up any existing locking/syncing introduced in this patch? I'd like to throw some cycles on this, so I'll start by looking in this patch again more carefully (and guest SMP as well). Antonios