From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM PVDMA status?
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:01:46 +0200
Message-ID: <4EEF27AA.9020203@redhat.com>
References: <CAJWyRx0L9RgBbWWF5UKrNCHjs1QDgGuP4NBi9gUdVNaC1XZ1Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Doyle <stephendoyle75@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55256 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751629Ab1LSMBu (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 19 Dec 2011 07:01:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJWyRx0L9RgBbWWF5UKrNCHjs1QDgGuP4NBi9gUdVNaC1XZ1Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/19/2011 01:57 PM, Stephen Doyle wrote:
> I have found a number of threads from 2007/2008 in the mailing list
> archives discussing patches for PVDMA support in KVM. From looking at
> the latest kernel source, it does not look like this feature is
> present.
>
> Can anybody provide a status on PVDMA support?

It's dead, as IOMMUs are the norm on modern hardware.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function