From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"avi@redhat.com" <avi@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: Remove ability to assign a device without iommu support
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:03:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EF04F54.9010500@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324370959.22797.3.camel@lappy>
On 2011-12-20 09:49, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 20:19 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> This option has no users and it exposes a security hole that we
>> can allow devices to be assigned without iommu protection. Make
>> KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU a mandatory option.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
>> index 3ad0925..a251a28 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
>> @@ -487,6 +487,9 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_assign_device(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *match;
>> struct pci_dev *dev;
>>
>> + if (!(assigned_dev->flags & KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Could we just drop KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU and do it by default?
> calling KVM_ASSIGN_PCI_DEVICE without that flag set it pretty
> meaningless.
There is that thing called "backward compatibility". :)
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-20 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-20 3:19 [PATCH 0/2] kvm: Lock down device assignment Alex Williamson
2011-12-20 3:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] kvm: Remove ability to assign a device without iommu support Alex Williamson
2011-12-20 8:49 ` Sasha Levin
2011-12-20 9:03 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-12-20 9:08 ` Sasha Levin
2011-12-20 9:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-12-20 9:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-20 14:28 ` Alex Williamson
2011-12-20 9:19 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-20 3:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] kvm: Device assignment permission checks Alex Williamson
2011-12-20 9:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] kvm: Lock down device assignment Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EF04F54.9010500@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).