From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dor Laor Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 V5] Avoid soft lockup message when KVM is stopped by host Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:18:51 +0200 Message-ID: <4EF2F5FB.1030200@redhat.com> References: <1323116344-17911-1-git-send-email-emunson@mgebm.net> <20111208113422.GA27919@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4EE9E023.4000904@redhat.com> <20111219125217.GC3139@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4EEF3538.9060808@redhat.com> <20111219175921.GA4668@amit-x200.redhat.com> Reply-To: dlaor@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Eric B Munson , mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, ryanh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com, levinsasha928@gmail.com, Jan Kiszka , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Amit Shah Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111219175921.GA4668@amit-x200.redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 12/19/2011 07:59 PM, Amit Shah wrote: > On (Mon) 19 Dec 2011 [14:59:36], Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 12/19/2011 02:52 PM, Amit Shah wrote: > > (snip) > >>> S4 needs some treatment, though, as resume after s4 doesn't work with >>> kvmclock enabled. I didn't realise this series was only handling the >>> soft lockup case. >>> >> >> What's the issue there? > > Not sure yet; after resume, the VM freezes while bringing the 2nd vcpu > up. Maybe it's just sitting there spinning, maybe the delta needs > adjusting. Haven't poked at it yet. Bug 694801 - Guest fail to resume from S4 if guest using kvmclock