From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] KVM: MMU: remove PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:07:00 +0800
Message-ID: <4EF3FE64.4070102@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <4EEB19AF.5070501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4EEB1AFB.1090806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4EEDC396.8090600@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.6]:46705 "EHLO
	e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751525Ab1LWEHJ (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:07:09 -0500
Received: from /spool/local
	by e28smtp06.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org> from <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
	Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:37:06 +0530
In-Reply-To: <4EEDC396.8090600@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/18/2011 06:42 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:

> On 12/16/2011 12:18 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> It is not used, remove it
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |    1 -
>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> index 5d0f0e3..234a32e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -91,7 +91,6 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
>>  #define PTE_PREFETCH_NUM		8
>>
>>  #define PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 9
>> -#define PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 52
>>
>>
> 
> Don't see a reason to drop it, we may use it some day.
> 


Anyway, it is not used in currently code, I do not have strong opinion on it :)
Please ignore it if you do not like.