From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: MMU: Trivial fix and cleanups Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:17:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4EF873E6.90809@redhat.com> References: <20111129140147.c6b5a8f9.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com To: Takuya Yoshikawa Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54067 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755371Ab1LZNRa (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Dec 2011 08:17:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111129140147.c6b5a8f9.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/29/2011 07:01 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > Made when I was reading mmu code. > > Takuya > > BTW, is threre any good way to test large page functionality? > Just booting a guest with transparent hugepages enabled is a good test. The guest kernel will use hugepages itself even if applications don't. With [en]pt = 0, the test is even harder, since kvm will have to remove any large mappings in a frame that contains a guest page table. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function