From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] KVM: MMU: combine unsync and unsync_children
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:45:39 +0800
Message-ID: <4F0BC273.3080707@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <4EEB19AF.5070501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4EEB19D6.60101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120109111638.GA5255@amt.cnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120109111638.GA5255@amt.cnet>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 01/09/2012 07:16 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:


> In general, given the number of optimizations made to the shadow mmu
> code, and the fact that over time NPT will dominate, i'd suggest time
> should be spent improving other areas.
> 

I totally agree with you, thanks Marcelo!