public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: Fix writeback on page boundary that propagate changes in spite of #PF
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:21:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0EB40C.7060201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120112101259.GW2167@redhat.com>

On 01/12/2012 12:12 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:53:31PM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > Consider the case in which an instruction emulation writeback is performed on a page boundary.
> > In such case, if a #PF occurs on the second page, the write to the first page already occurred and cannot be retracted.
> > Therefore, validation of the second page access must be performed prior to writeback.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   13 +++++++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 05fd3d7..7af3d67 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -3626,6 +3626,8 @@ struct read_write_emulator_ops {
> >  			       int bytes, void *val);
> >  	int (*read_write_exit_mmio)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
> >  				    void *val, int bytes);
> > +	gpa_t (*read_write_validate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva,
> > +				     struct x86_exception *exception);
> >  	bool write;
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -3686,6 +3688,7 @@ static struct read_write_emulator_ops write_emultor = {
> >  	.read_write_emulate = write_emulate,
> >  	.read_write_mmio = write_mmio,
> >  	.read_write_exit_mmio = write_exit_mmio,
> > +	.read_write_validate = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write,
> >  	.write = true,
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -3750,6 +3753,16 @@ int emulator_read_write(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned long addr,
> >  		int rc, now;
> >  
> >  		now = -addr & ~PAGE_MASK;
> > +
> > +		/* First check there is no page-fault on the next page */
> > +		if (ops->read_write_validate &&
> > +			ops->read_write_validate(vcpu, addr+now, exception) ==
> > +			UNMAPPED_GVA) {
> > +			/* #PF on the first page should be reported first */
> > +			ops->read_write_validate(vcpu, addr, exception);
> > +			return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT;
> > +		}
> > +
> This undoes optimization that vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa() has for handling
> mmio. 

Right.  I suggest changing I/O to have two phases: first, translate the
virtual address into an array of two physical addresses; check
exceptions and report.  Then do the actual writes.

> Furthermore for common (non faulting) case we will check page
> tables twice on each write that crosses page boundary, first time here
> and second time in emulator_read_write_onepage().

Those should be very uncommon.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-12 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-11 16:53 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Exception during emulation decode should propagate Nadav Amit
2012-01-11 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: Fix writeback on page boundary that propagate changes in spite of #PF Nadav Amit
2012-01-12 10:12   ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-12 10:21     ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-01-12 10:27       ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-14 18:27         ` Nadav Amit
2012-01-11 22:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Exception during emulation decode should propagate Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-01-12  0:26   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-01-12  9:07     ` Nadav Amit
2012-01-12  9:14       ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-01-12 10:16       ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F0EB40C.7060201@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox