From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want
	-kvm-shadow-memory semantics?
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:39:01 +0100
Message-ID: <4F185535.1060908@siemens.com>
References: <4F1810AF.8010002@siemens.com> <20120119172802.GD11381@amt.cnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120119172802.GD11381@amt.cnet>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 2012-01-19 18:28, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:46:39PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> do we need some KVM knob comparable to qemu-kvm's -kvm-shadow-memory in
>> upstream?
>>
>> If yes: The underlying IOCTL is x86-only. Are other archs interested in
>> this long-term as well, ie. should the control become arch-independent?
>>
>> Jan
> 
> Last time i asked about removal, Avi wished for it to remain.
> 

Then I guess he should comment on this after returning to work. :)

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux