From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:08:58 -0600 Message-ID: <4F1EBB7A.8090903@codemonkey.ws> References: <4F1EB8AF.3080804@codemonkey.ws> <4F1EBA35.20902@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , qemu-devel , Markus Armbruster To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:32841 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754974Ab2AXOJC (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:09:02 -0500 Received: by iacb35 with SMTP id b35so5424729iac.19 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:09:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F1EBA35.20902@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/24/2012 08:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 01/24/2012 02:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> >> I don't have anything pressing. I vote to cancel the call. > > Nothing that cannot be discussed by email, but anyway here are a couple of topics: Ok. > > * qtest/libos: Python or C? Both. > * QOM merge: what about a "new device freeze" for 1.1 around mid February? I'm not sure it's necessary. For 2/4, I was blocked on the prep and bamboo merges which just got in yesterday, I'm going to rebase right now and send out patches. I think this are ready for merge so if there aren't major comments in the next couple days, I'll apply them. 3/4 is very invasive, but should be non-controversial. There are no not-for-merge's like there were for 2/4 so I hope it can be applied quickly. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Paolo >