From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp,
avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86 emulator: Fix task switch privilege checks
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:58:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F229F7E.5030905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120125160058.GG19255@amd.com>
Am 25.01.2012 17:00, schrieb Joerg Roedel:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 06:23:50PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:24:50PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
>>> However, task_switch_interception() itself does some more based on the
>>> value of reason, for example it decides whether or not to call
>>> skip_emulated_instruction().
>>>
>> Joerg need to help us here. If intercept of task switch happens before
>> rip is advanced past instruction that cause it we have to know somehow
>> that task switch was caused by instruction. It is not enough that HW
>> checks permission, we still lack essential info.
>
> Hmm, the RIP in the VMCB points to the instruction causing the task
> switch. This is also true for lcall and ljmp. But in my experiments I
> have seen exit_int_info.valid = 1 for task-switches that went through
> the IDT. But I havn't tested the VM86 case, though.
>
> Kevin, can you please re-verify that exit_int_info.valid is always 0 in
> your experiment? On what hardware have you tested this?
I just retried. I use kvm-kmod and kvm.git with HEAD at ff92e9b5 plus
the tree patches of this series plus a printk to output exit_int_info in
task_switch_intercept(). I ran taskswitch2 from kvm-unittests and got
two failures and my VM86 unit test which hung when trying to return from
VM86. I also ran the kernel that made me aware of the issue initially.
All debug messages show exit_int_info = 0.
This is the /proc/cpuinfo snippet for the first core:
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 107
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 1800.000
cache size : 512 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext
fxsr_opt rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow rep_good nopl extd_apicid pni cx16
lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy 3dnowprefetch lbrv
bogomips : 3592.64
TLB size : 1024 4K pages
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-27 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 16:10 [PATCH 0/3] Fix task switches into/out of VM86 Kevin Wolf
2012-01-23 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86 emulator: Fix task switch privilege checks Kevin Wolf
2012-01-24 9:52 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-24 10:09 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-24 10:17 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-24 10:38 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-24 10:52 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-24 11:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-24 11:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-24 14:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-01-24 14:15 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-24 14:16 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-24 14:24 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-24 16:23 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-25 16:00 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-01-25 18:29 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-27 12:58 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2012-01-27 13:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-01-27 13:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-27 14:17 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-01-27 15:02 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-27 15:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-23 16:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86 emulator: VM86 segments must have DPL 3 Kevin Wolf
2012-01-23 16:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86 emulator: Allow PM/VM86 switch during task switch Kevin Wolf
2012-01-24 10:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-24 11:31 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-24 11:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-24 11:44 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F229F7E.5030905@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox