From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] KVM: Introduce kvm_memory_slot::arch and move lpage_info into it Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:18:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4F27B1F8.9040500@redhat.com> References: <20120130124859.6c3bb19f.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <20120130125308.51e22f12.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <20120130143533.e52efcbe.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <4F274144.9000606@oss.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Graf , cotte@de.ibm.com, Paul Mackerras , borntraeger@de.ibm.com To: Takuya Yoshikawa Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34613 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752695Ab2AaJS6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:18:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F274144.9000606@oss.ntt.co.jp> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/31/2012 03:17 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > Added s390 and ppc developers to Cc, > > (2012/01/30 14:35), Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: >> Some members of kvm_memory_slot are not used by every architecture. >> >> This patch is the first step to make this difference clear by >> introducing kvm_memory_slot::arch; lpage_info is moved into it. > > I am planning to move rmap stuff into arch next if this patch is > accepted. > > Please let me know if you have some opinion about which members should be > moved into this. > Is there anything else? Everything else seems to be generic. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function