From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: add tracepoints to trace mmio begin and complete
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:56:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2ACE46.4000307@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F2ACE04.9040602@gmail.com>
On 02/02/2012 07:55 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 02/03/2012 01:36 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> > On 02/02/2012 07:27 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> 'perf kvm-events' will use kvm_exit and kvm_mmio(read...) to calculate
> >> mmio read emulated time for the old kernel, in order to trace mmio read
> >> event more exactly, we add kvm_mmio_begin to trace the time when mmio read
> >> begins
> >>
> >> Also, add kvm_mmio_done to trace the time when mmio/pio is completed
> >
> > Previously, we discussed using the kvm_entry to do this. This reduces
> > the number of tracepoints, and is backwards compatible. What was the
> > conclusion?
> >
>
>
> Since using kvm_entry can cause lots of unnecessary calculated, these new two
> tracepoints can let the result be exacter.
Do you have numbers on the ratio between kvm_entry traces and
kvm_mmio_begin/end traces?
> And, they are only used in new kernel, we will fall back to using kvm_entry if
> they are not existing, that means it does not break backwards compatible.
Ah ok.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-02 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 17:25 [PATCH v2] KVM: perf: a smart tool to analyse kvm events Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-02 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: move kvm_exit related definitions into kvm_exit.h Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-02 17:30 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-02 17:48 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-02 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: add tracepoints to trace mmio begin and complete Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-02 17:36 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-02 17:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-02 17:56 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-02-02 18:27 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-02 18:43 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-02 17:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: perf: kvm events analysis tool Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F2ACE46.4000307@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox