From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 3.3] KVM: Fix write protection race during dirty logging
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:40:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2F4B99.6050902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120205204241.54f16069c7f10ac7524c55ec@gmail.com>
On 02/05/2012 07:42 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
>
> This patch fixes a race introduced by:
>
> commit 95d4c16ce78cb6b7549a09159c409d52ddd18dae
> KVM: Optimize dirty logging by rmap_write_protect()
>
> During protecting pages for dirty logging, other threads may also try
> to protect a page in mmu_sync_children() or kvm_mmu_get_page().
>
> In such a case, because get_dirty_log releases mmu_lock before flushing
> TLB's, the following race condition can happen:
>
> A (get_dirty_log) B (another thread)
>
> lock(mmu_lock)
> clear pte.w
> unlock(mmu_lock)
> lock(mmu_lock)
> pte.w is already cleared
> unlock(mmu_lock)
> skip TLB flush
> return
> ...
> TLB flush
>
> Though thread B assumes the page has already been protected when it
> returns, the remaining TLB entry will break that assumption.
>
> This patch fixes this problem by making get_dirty_log hold the mmu_lock
> until it flushes the TLB's.
>
I do not think this is a problem since the dirty page is logged when
the writeable spte is being set, and in the end of get_dirty_log, all
TLBs are always flushed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-05 11:42 [PATCH for 3.3] KVM: Fix write protection race during dirty logging Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-06 3:40 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-02-06 3:46 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-06 3:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-06 5:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-06 5:12 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-06 9:48 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-08 16:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-02-09 13:54 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F2F4B99.6050902@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).