kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>,
	avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 3.3] KVM: Fix write protection race during dirty logging
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:53:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2F4EB6.4040105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F2F4D06.8020303@oss.ntt.co.jp>

On 02/06/2012 11:46 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:

> (2012/02/06 12:40), Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 02/05/2012 07:42 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
>>
>>> From: Takuya Yoshikawa<yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
>>>
>>> This patch fixes a race introduced by:
>>>
>>>    commit 95d4c16ce78cb6b7549a09159c409d52ddd18dae
>>>    KVM: Optimize dirty logging by rmap_write_protect()
>>>
>>> During protecting pages for dirty logging, other threads may also try
>>> to protect a page in mmu_sync_children() or kvm_mmu_get_page().
>>>
>>> In such a case, because get_dirty_log releases mmu_lock before flushing
>>> TLB's, the following race condition can happen:
>>>
>>>    A (get_dirty_log)     B (another thread)
>>>
>>>    lock(mmu_lock)
>>>    clear pte.w
>>>    unlock(mmu_lock)
>>>                          lock(mmu_lock)
>>>                          pte.w is already cleared
>>>                          unlock(mmu_lock)
>>>                          skip TLB flush
>>>                          return
>>>    ...
>>>    TLB flush
>>>
>>> Though thread B assumes the page has already been protected when it
>>> returns, the remaining TLB entry will break that assumption.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes this problem by making get_dirty_log hold the mmu_lock
>>> until it flushes the TLB's.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I do not think this is a problem since the dirty page is logged when
>> the writeable spte is being set, and in the end of get_dirty_log, all
>> TLBs are always flushed.
>>
> 
> The victim is not GET_DIRTY_LOG but thread B;  it needs to assure the page
> is protected before returning.
> 


Ah, right!

Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-06  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-05 11:42 [PATCH for 3.3] KVM: Fix write protection race during dirty logging Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-06  3:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-06  3:46   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-06  3:53     ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-02-06  5:02       ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-06  5:12         ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-06  9:48           ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-08 16:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-02-09 13:54   ` Takuya Yoshikawa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F2F4EB6.4040105@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).