From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: perf: kvm events analysis tool Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:36:20 -0700 Message-ID: <4F333F34.4020007@gmail.com> References: <4F3121DE.7020502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F31225C.1020703@gmail.com> <4F316596.3060509@gmail.com> <4F3212CA.4080208@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F32861C.5020907@gmail.com> <4F333877.8050508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Xiao Guangrong , Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Stefan Hajnoczi , LKML , KVM To: Xiao Guangrong Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F333877.8050508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 02/08/2012 08:07 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > Thanks for your review and explanation! > > The code of commit_pager_choice(): > static void commit_pager_choice(void) > { > switch (use_pager) { > case 0: > setenv("PERF_PAGER", "cat", 1); > break; > case 1: > /* setup_pager(); */ > break; > default: > break; > } > } > > setup_pager() is not called. > > And it looks like kvm-events can not show the result properly if > i try to remove setup_pager. > > You're right; I blew right past the fact that it is a comment.