From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: perf: kvm events analysis tool
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:33:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3C953B.2060803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3C8E84.80905@gmail.com>
On 02/16/2012 01:05 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/15/12 9:59 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>
>> Okay, i will post the next version after collecting your new comments!
>>
>> Thanks for your time, David! :)
>>
>
> I had more comments, but got sidetracked and forgot to come back to this. I still haven't looked at the code yet, but some comments from testing:
>
> 1. The error message:
> Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 4
> Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 0
> Warning: unknown op '}'
>
> is fixed by this patch which has not yet made its way into perf:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/4/41
>
> The most recent request:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/8/479
>
> Arnaldo: the patch still applies cleanly (but with an offset of -2 lines).
>
Great, it is a good fix.
But, it does not hurt the development of kvm-events.
>
> 2. negatve testing:
>
> perf kvm-events record -e kvm:* -p 2603 -- sleep 10
>
> Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 7
> Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 0
> Warning: failed to read event print fmt for kvm_apic
> Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 7
> Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 0
> Warning: failed to read event print fmt for kvm_inj_exception
> Fatal: bad op token {
>
> If other kvm events are specified in the record line they appear to be silently ignored in the report in which case why allow the -e option to record?
>
Yes, kvm-events doese not analyse these events specified by -e option since
these events are not needed by vmexit/ioport/mmio analysis.
And after kvm-evnets record, you can see these events by perf script
>
> 3. What is happening for multiple VMs?
>
> a. perf kvm-events report
> data is collected for all VMs. What is displayed in the report? An
> average for all VMs?
>
Yes
> b. perf kvm-events report --vcpu 1
> Does this given an average of all vcpu 1's?
>
Yes
> Perhaps a -p option for the report to pull out events related to a single VM. Really this could be a generic option (to perf-report and perf-script as well) to only show/analyze events for the specified pid. ie., data is recorded for all VMs (or system wide for the regular perf-record) and you want to only consider events for a specific pid. e.g., in process_sample_event() skip event if event->ip.pid != report_pid (works for perf code because PERF_SAMPLE_TID attribute is always set).
Analysis for per VMs is good idea, but please allow me put it into my TODO list. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 5:32 [PATCH 3/3] KVM: perf: kvm events analysis tool David Ahern
2012-02-13 10:06 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-13 15:52 ` David Ahern
2012-02-16 4:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-16 5:05 ` David Ahern
2012-02-16 5:33 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-02-16 16:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-06 8:55 [PATCH v5 0/3] " Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-06 8:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-09 9:06 [PATCH v4 0/3] " Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-09 9:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-13 3:04 ` David Ahern
2012-02-13 5:00 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-20 23:47 ` David Ahern
2012-02-21 3:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-21 4:58 ` David Ahern
2012-02-27 4:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-01-16 9:30 [RFC][PATCH] KVM: perf: a smart tool to analyse kvm events Xiao Guangrong
2012-01-16 9:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: perf: kvm events analysis tool Xiao Guangrong
2012-01-16 10:04 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-17 2:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-01-24 12:49 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-16 10:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-17 2:37 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-01-17 11:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-01-24 12:51 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3C953B.2060803@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).