From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: perf: kvm events analysis tool
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:57:05 +0800
Message-ID: <4F4B0D21.6060002@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <4F338CAA.10807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F338D56.6010505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F42DB8D.7060900@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F42DB8D.7060900@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 02/21/2012 07:47 AM, David Ahern wrote:


>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.h b/tools/perf/util/thread.h
>> index 70c2c13..c48ebf3 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/thread.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.h
>> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ struct thread {
>>       bool            comm_set;
>>       char            *comm;
>>       int            comm_len;
>> +
>> +    void            *private;
> Arnaldo: Are you ok with this design for now? I can fix this command to whatever API we agree to when it gets committed.


Hi Arnaldo,

What do you think of it? :)