From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Tuesday 28th Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:09:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4F4BFF1A.8040703@redhat.com> References: <87r4xg1n5g.fsf@elfo.elfo> <4F4BBBA8.3020105@redhat.com> <4F4BFC9A.1020300@redhat.com> <4F4BFE4D.8000409@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Blake , quintela@trasno.org, KVM devel mailing list , Developers qemu-devel To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F4BFE4D.8000409@codemonkey.ws> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Il 27/02/2012 23:06, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: > > Thanks! One thing I'm having trouble following on your proposal: What > commands are valid within > blockdev-start-transaction/blockdev-commit-transaction? > > If I do: > > blockdev-start-transaction > stop > drive-reopen > drive-mirror > blockdev-end-transaction > > What state should I expect that my guest is in (paused or running)? Paused. Only the two new commands and blockdev-snapshot-sync are part of the transaction (edited the wiki now). What I like most in Jeff's new command is that it's not even a question. On the other hand we have to be sure that we can extend it, and perhaps change its name already in 1.1... Paolo