From: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, jasowang@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
alex williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
avi@redhat.com, levinsasha928@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: Resize kvm_io_range array dynamically
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:19:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4F06DC.6030400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b6f7414-7cae-4349-9f5d-eb6c3febf612@zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
On 01/03/12 00:34, Amos Kong wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 2012-02-29 16:22, Amos Kong wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> On 2012-02-29 14:30, Amos Kong wrote:
>>>>> kvm_io_bus devices are used for ioevent, pit, pic, ioapic,
>>>>> coalesced_mmio.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently Qemu only emulates one PCI bus, it contains 32 slots,
>>>>> one slot contains 8 functions, maximum of supported PCI devices:
>>>>> 1 * 32 * 8 = 256. The maximum of coalesced mmio zone is 100,
>>>>> each zone has an iobus devices. 300 io_bus devices is not enough.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch makes the kvm_io_range array can be resized
>>>>> dynamically.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any limit, or can userspace allocate arbitrary amounts of
>>>> kernel memory this way?
>>>
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> There is a fixed array in linux-2.6/include/linux/kvm_host.h,
>>> we can only register 300 devices.
>>>
>>> struct kvm_io_range {
>>> gpa_t addr;
>>> int len;
>>> struct kvm_io_device *dev;
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct kvm_io_bus {
>>> int dev_count;
>>> #define NR_IOBUS_DEVS 300
>>> struct kvm_io_range range[NR_IOBUS_DEVS];
>>> };
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> Right. But doesn't your patch remove precisely this limit? So what
>> limits userspace now? To register 300 million devices...?
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> It seems we need to reserve the limitation in kvm_host.h
>
> #define NR_IOBUS_DEVS 600
>
> /* Currently Qemu only emulates one PCI bus, it contains 32 slots,
> one slot contains 8 functions. Only 29 slots can be used to
> add multiple function devices. Maximum of supported PCI devices:
> 29 * 8 = 232. Each virtio-blk device needs 1 iobus device,
> each virtio-net(vhost) device requires 2 such devices to service
> notifications (ioevent) from rx/tx queues.
> The maximum of coalesced mmio zone is 100, each zone has an iobus
> devices. ioevent, pit, ioapic take less iobus devices.
>
> So we can set max limitation to 600. */
One virtio-net(vhost=on) takes two iobus devices,
and it needs three IRQs for MSI/MIS-X.
I started a guest with 232 virtio-net(vhost=on),
guest IRQ 24 to 191 were used for virtio-config/input/output,
and only 56 virtio-nics' MSIX were enabled.
56 virtio-net(vhost=on) registered 56 * 2 = 112 iobus devices.
It's safe to set the limit to 300, right ?
> ----- check limit when register dev ----
>
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:
>
> /* Caller must hold slots_lock. */
> int kvm_io_bus_register_dev(struct kvm *kvm, enum kvm_bus bus_idx, gpa_t addr,
> int len, struct kvm_io_device *dev)
> {
> struct kvm_io_bus *new_bus, *bus;
>
> bus = kvm->buses[bus_idx];
> if (bus->dev_count> NR_IOBUS_DEVS - 1) // can only register 600 devices
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> Amos.
--
Amos.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-01 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-29 5:24 [PATCH] KVM: Resize kvm_io_bus_range array dynamically Amos Kong
2012-02-29 5:50 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: Resize kvm_io_range " Amos Kong
2012-02-29 13:30 ` [PATCH v3] " Amos Kong
2012-02-29 14:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-02-29 15:22 ` Amos Kong
2012-02-29 15:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-02-29 16:34 ` Amos Kong
2012-03-01 5:19 ` Amos Kong [this message]
2012-03-01 7:01 ` [PATCH v4] " Amos Kong
2012-03-01 10:14 ` Sasha Levin
2012-03-01 15:33 ` Alex Williamson
2012-03-07 10:57 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-07 12:51 ` Amos Kong
2012-03-07 14:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] KVM: resize " Amos Kong
2012-03-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: set upper bounds for iobus dev to limit userspace Amos Kong
2012-03-07 13:20 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 0/2] fix ENOSPC issue of iobus dev Amos Kong
2012-03-07 13:20 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 1/2] KVM: resize kvm_io_range array dynamically Amos Kong
2012-03-07 13:20 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: set upper bounds for iobus dev to limit userspace Amos Kong
2012-03-08 2:03 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] fix ENOSPC issue of iobus dev Amos Kong
2012-03-08 2:03 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] KVM: resize kvm_io_range array dynamically Amos Kong
2012-03-08 23:20 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-09 4:05 ` Amos Kong
2012-03-08 2:04 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] KVM: set upper bounds for iobus dev to limit userspace Amos Kong
2012-03-09 4:17 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] fix ENOSPC issue of iobus dev Amos Kong
2012-03-09 4:17 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] KVM: resize kvm_io_range array dynamically Amos Kong
2012-03-09 4:17 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] KVM: set upper bounds for iobus dev to limit userspace Amos Kong
2012-03-09 21:07 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] fix ENOSPC issue of iobus dev Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4F06DC.6030400@redhat.com \
--to=akong@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).