From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for tuesday 31
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:10:33 +0200
Message-ID: <4F54D769.5050000@redhat.com>
References: <87ehuhrpel.fsf@elfo.elfo> <4F272A92.2010609@suse.de> <4F272D8C.8020608@codemonkey.ws> <4F27E98E.2080501@suse.de> <CAFEAcA_u2qTgnaNMvVRn_K+3SrbaTLMUs4NH654wgQGAnFGxTg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFEAcA86m4wKbDFQk=Qmn3mUDDuPod9q15HgGBgPk0sFkC2sag@mail.gmail.com> <4F54C1C0.6030803@samsung.com> <4F54CA04.4070804@redhat.com> <4F54CFA3.6080400@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYg==?= =?UTF-8?B?ZXI=?=
	<afaerber@suse.de>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	quintela@redhat.com, Developers qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Solodkiy <d.solodkiy@samsung.com>
To: i.mitsyanko@samsung.com
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56123 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S964934Ab2CEPKp (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:10:45 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4F54CFA3.6080400@samsung.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 03/05/2012 04:37 PM, Igor Mitsyanko wrote:
>> Well, can't you make sd.c target dependent?  It's not so nice, but it
>> does solve the problem.
>>
>
> OK, but it will turn qemu from it's "long term path to suppress *all*
> target specific code" :)
>

The other alternative is to s/target_phys_addr_t/uint64_t/ in the memory
API.  I think 32-on-32 is quite rare these days, so it wouldn't be much
of a performance issue.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function