From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for tuesday 31
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:21:15 +0200
Message-ID: <4F54D9EB.9030906@redhat.com>
References: <87ehuhrpel.fsf@elfo.elfo> <4F272A92.2010609@suse.de> <4F272D8C.8020608@codemonkey.ws> <4F27E98E.2080501@suse.de> <CAFEAcA_u2qTgnaNMvVRn_K+3SrbaTLMUs4NH654wgQGAnFGxTg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFEAcA86m4wKbDFQk=Qmn3mUDDuPod9q15HgGBgPk0sFkC2sag@mail.gmail.com> <4F54C1C0.6030803@samsung.com> <4F54CA04.4070804@redhat.com> <4F54CFA3.6080400@samsung.com> <4F54D769.5050000@redhat.com> <CAFEAcA-fDQ9nYS30fyR9ejgZU7b5XGjN_zN7Z+0=JWr1vp+JkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: i.mitsyanko@samsung.com,
	=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, quintela@redhat.com,
	Developers qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Solodkiy <d.solodkiy@samsung.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39354 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S964837Ab2CEPV0 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:21:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-fDQ9nYS30fyR9ejgZU7b5XGjN_zN7Z+0=JWr1vp+JkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 03/05/2012 05:20 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 March 2012 15:10, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I think 32-on-32 is quite rare these days, so it wouldn't be much
> > of a performance issue.
>
> 32-on-32 will be the standard case for KVM on ARM I think...

Won't we be virtualizing LPAE per default?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function