public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"laurent@vivier.eu" <laurent@vivier.eu>,
	"anthony@codemonkey.ws" <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fix select(2) race between main_loop_wait and qemu_aio_wait
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:55:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F54FE2C.6030201@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F54FA6D.2010100@redhat.com>

On 2012-03-05 18:39, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/05/2012 04:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-03-05 15:24, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> Long-term, I'd like to cut out certain file descriptors from the main
>>>> loop and process them completely in separate threads (for separate
>>>> locking, prioritization etc.). Dunno how NBD works, but maybe it should
>>>> be reworked like this already.
>>>
>>> Ideally qemu_set_fd_handler2() should be made thread local, and each
>>> device thread would run a copy of the main loop, just working on
>>> different data.
>>
>> qemu_set_fd_handler2 may not only be called over an iothread. Rather, we
>> need an object and associated lock that is related to the io-path (i.e.
>> frontend device + backend driver). That object has to be passed to
>> services like qemu_set_fd_handler2.
> 
> Not sure I like implicit lock-taking.  In particular, how does it
> interact with unregistering an fd_handler?

I wasn't suggesting implicit lock taking, just decoupling from our
infamous global lock. My point is that thread-local won't help here.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

      reply	other threads:[~2012-03-05 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-05  8:34 [RFC PATCH] fix select(2) race between main_loop_wait and qemu_aio_wait Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-05  9:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-03-05  9:25   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-05 14:24   ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 14:30     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-05 15:14       ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 16:14         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-05 17:35           ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-06  9:01             ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-05 14:30     ` Jan Kiszka
2012-03-05 17:39       ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 17:55         ` Jan Kiszka [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F54FE2C.6030201@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox