From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Enable VMX-related bits in MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL. Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:14:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4F576D32.9000500@redhat.com> References: <1331046141-11101-1-git-send-email-js@alien8.de> <4F5629A0.8060209@redhat.com> <20120306154738.GA15125@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> <20120306173308.GA20590@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> <4F573367.5000707@redhat.com> <20120307111045.GA1408@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Julian Stecklina , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: "Nadav Har'El" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1720 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755567Ab2CGOOb (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:14:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20120307111045.GA1408@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/07/2012 01:10 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012, Avi Kivity wrote about "Re: [PATCH] KVM: Enable VMX-related bits in MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.": > > On 03/06/2012 07:33 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote: > > > By the way, am I right in my understanding that KVM doesn't support > > > SMX in the guest? > > > > Isn't nested vmx crazy enough? > > :-) > > > btw, any updates on nested EPT? Nested vmx is pointless without it. > > Isn't "pointless" a bit strong? :-) How's "unusable"? > I have done most of the changes that you asked for, but still need to finish > the EPT violation overhaul. I was meaning to work on this now, when I got > sidetracked by all these other small issues. > > Hopefully, I'll have a version ready for submittion by next week. > Great, looking forward. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function