From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 13 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:04:50 -0500 Message-ID: <4F5EAB42.7010208@codemonkey.ws> References: <87r4wyuh4w.fsf@elfo.elfo> <4F5E9352.1010806@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: quintela@redhat.com, "Liu, Jinsong" , KVM devel mailing list , Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:64468 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755804Ab2CMCFE (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:05:04 -0400 Received: by gghe5 with SMTP id e5so45998ggh.19 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:05:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F5E9352.1010806@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/12/2012 07:22 PM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > Am 12.03.2012 13:40, schrieb Juan Quintela: >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > * QEMU 1.1 roadmap > > If we're still aiming for a release in early May that would mean a > feature freeze in about four weeks. Soft freeze. Hard freeze is about six weeks away. > > http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.1 Yup. > > My stake is that I'd like to see CPUs and machines QOM'ified for 1.1, > and I'm aware that also CPU hot-plug and CPU versioning features depe= nd > on it. Not sure what timeline the respective authors have in mind, bu= t > IMO we should start counting backwards when series need to be finaliz= ed > on the list and by whom they should get merged. Easter is on April 8t= h > this year! > > Other features that I have in mind are qtest, qemu-test, gtk-doc and = 4th > QOM series. Not sure which of those were meant for 1.1. My personal development priorities are qtest, and qbus (4th QOM series)= =2E=20 qemu-test and gtk-doc are both nice to haves but I have a sneaking susp= icion=20 that they're going to require a non-trivial amount of work. > > With the Wiki closed, having contributors add Feature pages for their > 1.1 wishlist, as done for 1.0, is probably not going to work well, bu= t > collecting a rough list or dependency tree would be nice for planning= =2E The wiki isn't closed... I would hope most contributors would have an = account=20 and/or would not have a problem asking for an account. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Andreas >