From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Weil Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Lost VNC patches Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:16:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4F6118B3.8090509@weilnetz.de> References: <1331708328-21414-1-git-send-email-corentincj@iksaif.net> <4F6111B4.2050504@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Corentin Chary , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F6111B4.2050504@us.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Am 14.03.2012 22:46, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 03/14/2012 01:58 AM, Corentin Chary wrote: >> Hi Anthony, >> >> Please merge these two patchs from another age, they fix crash in the >> VNC >> server (the iohandler one is only for the threaded server). > > Applied. Thanks. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > The commit time of my patch was modified here. I had sent the patch on March 15, 2011, 6:45 p.m., so you could also have waited a day longer until its first birthday :-) There is a more serious background why I write this mail: commit requests should not modify the time when a patch was written. See http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/87029/ for the original. Cheers, Stefan W. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Corentin Chary (1): >> vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread >> >> Stefan Weil (1): >> vnc: Limit r/w access to size of allocated memory >> >> ui/vnc-jobs-async.c | 48 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- >> ui/vnc-jobs.h | 1 + >> ui/vnc.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ >> ui/vnc.h | 2 ++ >> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >