From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Switch to srcu-less get_dirty_log()
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:30:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F62EC25.5060306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120316155511.70455b4a.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
On 03/16/2012 02:55 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:03:48 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> For my quickly review, mmu_lock can not protect everything, if the guest page
>
> Yes and ...
>
>> is written out of the shadow page/ept table, dirty page will be lost.
>
> No.
>
>>
>> There is a example:
>>
>> CPU A CPU B
>> guest page is written by write-emulation
>>
>> hold mmu-lock and see dirty-bitmap
>> is not be changed, then migration is
>> completed.
>
> We do not allow this break.
>
Hmm? what can avoid this? Could you please point it out?
>>
>> call mark_page_dirty() to set dirty_bit map
>>
>>
>> Right?
>
>
> As you pointed out, we cannot assume mutual exclusion by mmu_lock.
> That is why we are using atomic bitmap operations: xchg and set_bit.
>
> In this sense we are at least guaranteed to get the dirty page
> information in dirty_bitmap - the current one or next one.
>
The problem is the guest page is written before dirty-bitmap is set,
we may log the dirty page in this window like above case...
> So what we should care about is to not miss the information written in
> the next bitmap at the time we actually migrate the guest.
>
Actually, the way log dirty page in MMU page-table is tricky:
set dirty-bitmap
allow spte to be writeable
page can be written
That means we always set dirty-bitmap _before_ page become dirty that is
the reason why your bitmap-way can work.
> Actually the userspace stops the guest at the final stage and then send the
> remaining pages found in the bitmap. So the above break between write and
> mark_page_dirty() cannot happen IIUC.
>
Maybe i'd better firstly understand why "We do not allow this break" :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-16 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-01 10:30 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: srcu-less dirty logging -v2 Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-01 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: Split the main body of rmap_write_protect() off from others Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-12 7:39 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-12 7:52 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-01 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: Avoid checking huge page mappings in get_dirty_log() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-02 2:56 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-02 5:11 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-12 18:04 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-13 9:20 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-13 10:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-13 23:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-14 1:04 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-14 5:34 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-14 10:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-01 10:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Switch to srcu-less get_dirty_log() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-03 5:21 ` [PATCH 3/4 changelog-v2] " Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-06 11:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-06 14:43 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-06 15:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-06 15:23 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-06 15:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-07 8:07 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-07 23:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-08 1:35 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-09 0:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-12 12:05 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-07 8:18 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-07 23:20 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-03-16 5:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] " Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-16 6:55 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-16 7:30 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-03-16 7:55 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-16 8:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-16 9:44 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-19 9:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-19 10:15 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-01 10:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Remove unused dirty_bitmap_head and nr_dirty_pages Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-03 5:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: srcu-less dirty logging -v2 Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-03-20 14:43 ` Avi Kivity
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-23 11:33 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: srcu-less dirty logging Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-23 11:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Switch to srcu-less get_dirty_log() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-28 11:46 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 7:49 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-29 9:25 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 10:16 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-02-29 12:27 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 14:18 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F62EC25.5060306@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).