From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Questing regarding KVM Guest PMU
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:50:18 +0200
Message-ID: <4F65F62A.5020109@redhat.com>
References: <CAMONAZ77gjNUvVaX35WMwdVFyUHTZGAuy5UHKtGU4NcfFzX4mg@mail.gmail.com> <20120318103020.GA27306@redhat.com> <CAMONAZ5TEzoTK3+7aCbvtc20DuvmQVpt4Yq1jyaqrnkeAehecQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: shashank rachamalla <shashank.rachamalla@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61553 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751933Ab2CROuW (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 18 Mar 2012 10:50:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAMONAZ5TEzoTK3+7aCbvtc20DuvmQVpt4Yq1jyaqrnkeAehecQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 03/18/2012 02:57 PM, shashank rachamalla wrote:
> 2012/3/18 Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 03:48:53PM +0530, shashank rachamalla wrote:
> >>
> >> CPU: Core 2, speed 2200.19 MHz (estimated)
> >> Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Clock cycles when not halted) with a
> >> unit mask of 0x00 (Unhalted core cycles) count 100000
> >> CPU_CLK_UNHALT...|
> >>  samples|      %|
> >> ------------------
> >>        1 100.000 /no-vmlinux
> >>
> >>
> > What happens if you run "perf stat -e cycles a.out"?
>
> This is what i get when I run "perf stat ./a.out" ( with --cpu host
> passed in qemu-kvm )
>
> Performance counter stats for './a.out':
>
>      954.925996  task-clock-msecs         #      0.955 CPUs
>              23  context-switches         #      0.000 M/sec
>               0  CPU-migrations           #      0.000 M/sec
>              93  page-faults              #      0.000 M/sec
>      2110635735  cycles                   #   2210.261 M/sec
>       901816391  instructions             #      0.427 IPC
>          247677  cache-references         #      0.259 M/sec
>           15044  cache-misses             #      0.016 M/sec
>
>     0.999846560  seconds time elapsed
>
> This is without --cpu host  ( Note that only software events get monitored )
>
> Performance counter stats for './a.out':
>
>      913.826372  task-clock-msecs         #      0.990 CPUs
>              13  context-switches         #      0.000 M/sec
>               0  CPU-migrations           #      0.000 M/sec
>              93  page-faults              #      0.000 M/sec
>   <not counted>  cycles
>   <not counted>  instructions
>   <not counted>  cache-references
>   <not counted>  cache-misses
>
>     0.923182044  seconds time elapsed
>
> I guess things are working fine with perf. But why not with oprofile ?
>
>

What kernel are you using in the guest?

IIRC oprofile is using perf for its data source, but perhaps this wasn't
tree in older kernels.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function