kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: add MMIO property
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:13:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F67AF72.8080905@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120319212916.GC9747@redhat.com>

On 03/19/2012 04:29 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 03/19/2012 03:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:19:33PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> On 03/19/2012 10:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> Currently virtio-pci is specified so that configuration of the device is
>>>>> done through a PCI IO space (via BAR 0 of the virtual PCI device).
>>>>> However, Linux guests happen to use ioread/iowrite/iomap primitives
>>>>> for access, and these work uniformly across memory/io BARs.
>>>>>
>>>>> While PCI IO accesses are faster than MMIO on x86 kvm,
>>>>> MMIO might be helpful on other systems which don't
>>>>> implement PIO or where PIO is slower than MMIO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Add a property to make it possible to tweak the BAR type.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is harmless by default but causes segfaults in memory.c
>>>>> when enabled. Thus an RFC until I figure out what's wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't this violate the virtio-pci spec?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The point is to change the BAR type depending on the architecture.
>>> IO is fastest on x86 but maybe not on other architectures.
>>
>> Are we going to document that the BAR is X on architecture Y in the spec?
>>
>> I think the better way to do this is to use a separate device id
>> range for MMIO virtio-pci.  You can make the same driver hand both
>> ranges and that way the device is presented consistently to the
>> guest regardless of what the architecture is.
>
> Maybe just make this a hidden option like x-miio?

x-violate-the-virtio-spec-to-trick-old-linux-drivers-into-working-on-power?

Really, aren't we just being too clever here?  From a practical perspective, I 
doubt anyone is ever going to support a driver that has *never* been tested on 
the platform just because it was accidentally compiled and happens to be there.

If we just do use a device PCI device id range for this, it's a 1-line patch 
that can be provided via an update to existing guests.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> This will ensure people dont turn it on by mistake on e.g. x86.
>
>>>> Making the same vendor/device ID have different semantics depending
>>>> on a magic flag in QEMU seems like a pretty bad idea to me.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Anthony Liguori
>>>
>>> We do this with MSI-X so why not the BAR type?
>>
>> We extend the bar size with MSI-X and use a transport flag to
>> indicate that it's available, right?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Anthony LIguori
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   hw/virtio-pci.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
>>>>>   hw/virtio-pci.h |    4 ++++
>>>>>   2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio-pci.c
>>>>> index 28498ec..6f338d2 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/virtio-pci.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/virtio-pci.c
>>>>> @@ -655,6 +655,7 @@ void virtio_init_pci(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, VirtIODevice *vdev)
>>>>>   {
>>>>>       uint8_t *config;
>>>>>       uint32_t size;
>>>>> +    uint8_t bar0_type;
>>>>>
>>>>>       proxy->vdev = vdev;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -684,8 +685,14 @@ void virtio_init_pci(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, VirtIODevice *vdev)
>>>>>
>>>>>       memory_region_init_io(&proxy->bar,&virtio_pci_config_ops, proxy,
>>>>>                             "virtio-pci", size);
>>>>> -    pci_register_bar(&proxy->pci_dev, 0, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO,
>>>>> -&proxy->bar);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    if (proxy->flags&    VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO) {
>>>>> +        bar0_type = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
>>>>> +    } else {
>>>>> +        bar0_type = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO;
>>>>> +    }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    pci_register_bar(&proxy->pci_dev, 0, bar0_type,&proxy->bar);
>>>>>
>>>>>       if (!kvm_has_many_ioeventfds()) {
>>>>>           proxy->flags&= ~VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD;
>>>>> @@ -823,6 +830,7 @@ static Property virtio_blk_properties[] = {
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_BIT("ioeventfd", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD_BIT, true),
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("vectors", VirtIOPCIProxy, nvectors, 2),
>>>>>       DEFINE_VIRTIO_BLK_FEATURES(VirtIOPCIProxy, host_features),
>>>>> +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mmio", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT, false),
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>>>>   };
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -856,6 +864,7 @@ static Property virtio_net_properties[] = {
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("x-txtimer", VirtIOPCIProxy, net.txtimer, TX_TIMER_INTERVAL),
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_INT32("x-txburst", VirtIOPCIProxy, net.txburst, TX_BURST),
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_STRING("tx", VirtIOPCIProxy, net.tx),
>>>>> +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mmio", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT, false),
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>>>>   };
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -888,6 +897,7 @@ static Property virtio_serial_properties[] = {
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_HEX32("class", VirtIOPCIProxy, class_code, 0),
>>>>>       DEFINE_VIRTIO_COMMON_FEATURES(VirtIOPCIProxy, host_features),
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("max_ports", VirtIOPCIProxy, serial.max_virtserial_ports, 31),
>>>>> +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mmio", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT, false),
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>>>>   };
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -915,6 +925,7 @@ static TypeInfo virtio_serial_info = {
>>>>>
>>>>>   static Property virtio_balloon_properties[] = {
>>>>>       DEFINE_VIRTIO_COMMON_FEATURES(VirtIOPCIProxy, host_features),
>>>>> +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mmio", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT, false),
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>>>>   };
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -969,6 +980,7 @@ static int virtio_scsi_exit_pci(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
>>>>>   static Property virtio_scsi_properties[] = {
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("vectors", VirtIOPCIProxy, nvectors, 2),
>>>>>       DEFINE_VIRTIO_SCSI_PROPERTIES(VirtIOPCIProxy, host_features, scsi),
>>>>> +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mmio", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags, VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT, false),
>>>>>       DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>>>>   };
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/virtio-pci.h b/hw/virtio-pci.h
>>>>> index e560428..e6a8861 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/virtio-pci.h
>>>>> +++ b/hw/virtio-pci.h
>>>>> @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@
>>>>>   #define VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD_BIT 1
>>>>>   #define VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD   (1<<    VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_IOEVENTFD_BIT)
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* Some guests don't support port IO. Use MMIO instead. */
>>>>> +#define VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT 2
>>>>> +#define VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO   (1<<    VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_USE_MMIO_BIT)
>>>>> +
>>>>>   typedef struct {
>>>>>       PCIDevice pci_dev;
>>>>>       VirtIODevice *vdev;
>>>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-19 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-19 15:56 [PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: add MMIO property Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-19 17:58 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-19 18:57   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-20 14:49     ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-19 19:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2012-03-19 20:49   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-19 21:07     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-19 21:20       ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-19 21:29       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-03-19 22:13         ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-03-19 23:52           ` Rusty Russell
2012-03-20  0:39             ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2012-06-18 12:05             ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F67AF72.8080905@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).