From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] RTC: New logic to emulate RTC
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:42:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4F6A757B.4020503@redhat.com>
References: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E09E729@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4F68759E.10805@redhat.com> <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0A3FB5@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"aliguori@us.ibm.com" <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49277 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754719Ab2CVAmm (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:42:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0A3FB5@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 22/03/2012 01:23, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto:
> Actually, I also see some failures during testing. And most of them
> are fail to pass the 244us update cycle checking. Since we are in
> emulation environment, we cannot ensure it always greater than 244us.
> So I think it should not be a bug.

Yes, that's fine.  But I also see some cases in which the first upgrade
cycle after divider reset is not reported.  The second, 1.5 seconds
after divider reset, is fine.

Paolo