From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM updates for the 3.4 merge window Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:38:37 +0300 Message-ID: <4F784C4D.3000409@redhat.com> References: <4F688F48.6090303@redhat.com> <1332461414.2982.90.camel@pasglop> <4F6EEEC1.4030608@redhat.com> <20120326213809.GA29788@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com> <4F7191E8.7020804@redhat.com> <20120330120107.GA28503@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-kernel , KVM list , Marcelo Tosatti , Paul Mackerras , Alexander Graf To: Paul Mackerras Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24849 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751367Ab2DAMiu (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:38:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120330120107.GA28503@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/30/2012 03:01 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > I just noticed that the branch you asked Linus to pull includes none > of the patches that Alex sent you in the last batch, in the email with > subject "[PULL 00/56] ppc patch queue 2012-03-15" sent on March 15, > where he asked you to pull git://github.com/agraf/linux-2.6.git > for-upstream. > > What happened? Did they get lost in the re-signing, or is there some > reason you thought they shouldn't go in? That pull request was send three days before the merge window opened; patches are supposed to cook for a while in -next before being merged, especially large trees like that one. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function