From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: New git workflow Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:50:29 -0500 Message-ID: <4F85E085.7070705@freescale.com> References: <4F7DD034.5090102@redhat.com> <4F81778C.4050202@redhat.com> <20120411122322.GB5007@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , KVM list , kvm-ppc , Marcelo Tosatti , Alexander Graf , Carsten Otte , "Roedel, Joerg" To: Paul Mackerras Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120411122322.GB5007@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 04/11/2012 07:23 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 02:33:32PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 04/05/2012 08:02 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >>> I'll publish the new branches tomorrow, with any luck. >> >> There wasn't any luck, so it's only ready today. To allow chance for >> review, I'm publishing next as next-candidate. >> >> Paul/Alex, please review the powerpc bits. Specifically: >> >> system.h is gone, so I moved the prototype of load_up_fpu() to >> and added a #include (8fae845f4956d). >> E6500 was added in upstream in parallel with the split of kvm >> E500/E500MC. I guessed which part of the #ifdef E6500 was to go into, >> but please verify (73196cd364a2, 06aae86799c1b). > > All looks OK as far as I can see, but I have asked Scott Wood to > double-check the e500/e500mc bits. e6500 should have CPU_FTR_EMB_HV. Otherwise looks OK. -Scott