From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/16] KVM: MMU: fask check whether page is writable
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:47:57 +0300
Message-ID: <4F8C06ED.6020805@redhat.com>
References: <4F87FA69.5060106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F87FC82.2050302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F8AE64F.7080909@redhat.com> <4F8B9115.2030807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F8BEE1B.8000704@redhat.com> <4F8BF265.7020405@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F8BF265.7020405@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 04/16/2012 01:20 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >>
> >> It is used to avoid the unnecessary overload 
> > 
> > It's overloading me :(
> > 
>
>
> Sorry.
>

The trick is to send those in separate patchset so the maintainer
doesn't notice.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function