public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tossati <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Konstantin Weitz <WEITZKON@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: Implement the directed yield (diag 9c) hypervisor call for KVM
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:04:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9696B8.8080108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335252285-54213-2-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

On 04/24/2012 10:24 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> From: Konstantin Weitz <WEITZKON@de.ibm.com>
>
> This patch implements the directed yield hypercall found on other
> System z hypervisors. It delegates execution time to the virtual cpu
> specified in the instruction's parameter.
>
> Useful to avoid long spinlock waits in the guest.
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 7343872..dd17537 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat {
>  	u32 instruction_sigp_restart;
>  	u32 diagnose_10;
>  	u32 diagnose_44;
> +	u32 diagnose_9c;
>  };
>  
>  struct kvm_s390_io_info {
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c b/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
> index a353f0e..8991009 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,48 @@ static int __diag_time_slice_end(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int __diag_time_slice_end_directed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *tcpu;
> +	int tid;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	tid = vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[(vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0xf0) >> 4];
> +	vcpu->stat.diagnose_9c++;
> +	VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 5, "diag time slice end directed to %d", tid);
> +
> +	if (tid == vcpu->vcpu_id)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tcpu, kvm) {
> +		if (tcpu->vcpu_id == tid) {

Can two vcpus match the same tid?

> +			struct task_struct *task = NULL;
> +			struct pid *pid;
> +			rcu_read_lock();
> +			pid = rcu_dereference(tcpu->pid);
> +			if (pid)
> +				task = get_pid_task(tcpu->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +			if (!task)
> +				break;
> +			if (task->flags & PF_VCPU) {
> +				put_task_struct(task);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +			vcpu_put(vcpu);
> +			if (yield_to(task, 1)) {
> +				vcpu_load(vcpu);

vcpu_put()/_load()s are unneeded here, preempt notifiers will
automatically call kvm_arch_vcpu_put()/_load() if we schedule.

> +				put_task_struct(task);
> +				return 0;
> +			}
> +			vcpu_load(vcpu);
> +			put_task_struct(task);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index d30c835..fd98914 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = {
>  	{ "instruction_sigp_restart", VCPU_STAT(instruction_sigp_restart) },
>  	{ "diagnose_10", VCPU_STAT(diagnose_10) },
>  	{ "diagnose_44", VCPU_STAT(diagnose_44) },
> +	{ "diagnose_9c", VCPU_STAT(diagnose_9c) },
>  	{ NULL }
>  };
>  

We're switching to tracepoints instead of homebrewed statistics.  It's
in feature-removal-schedule.txt already.  It's okay to add them now, but
please prepare for their removal.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-24 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-24  7:24 [PATCH 0/3] Fixes and feature for kvm-s390 Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24  7:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: Implement the directed yield (diag 9c) hypervisor call for KVM Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 12:04   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-04-24 12:44     ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 12:55       ` [PATCH 1/3v2] " Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 13:06         ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-24 15:47           ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 16:15             ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-24 16:21               ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 16:22                 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-25 13:30                   ` [PATCH 0/2] rework kvm_vcpu_on_spin Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-25 13:30                     ` [PATCH 1/2] kvm-s390: Implement the directed yield (diag 9c) hypervisor call for KVM Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-26 12:06                       ` Alexander Graf
2012-04-26 12:19                         ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-26 12:26                           ` Alexander Graf
2012-04-25 13:30                     ` [PATCH 2/2] kvm-s390: use kvm_vcpu_on_spin for diag 0x44 Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-29 11:10                     ` [PATCH 0/2] rework kvm_vcpu_on_spin Avi Kivity
2012-06-06 12:55     ` trace points and ABI Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-06 13:12       ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-24  7:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] kvm-s390: Handle sckpf instruction Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24  7:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: implement KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 12:06   ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-24 12:47     ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 13:01       ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-01  0:51         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-05-01  1:00           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-05-02  8:50             ` [PATCH 0/1] Updated Patch for NR/MAX VCPU on s390 Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-02  8:50               ` [PATCH 1/1] kvm-s390x: implement KVM_CAP_NR/MAX_VCPUS Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-02 21:36                 ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F9696B8.8080108@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=WEITZKON@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox