From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: implement KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:01:40 +0300
Message-ID: <4F96A434.7030203@redhat.com>
References: <1335252285-54213-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1335252285-54213-4-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <4F969734.6080401@redhat.com> <4F96A0F4.1010205@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tossati <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25790 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753977Ab2DXNCk (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:02:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4F96A0F4.1010205@de.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 04/24/2012 03:47 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > btw, a better place might be in kvm_devel_ioctl_check_extension_generic().
>
> Possibly yes. Dont know if there are architecture specific reasons to use
> something different than KVM_MAX_VCPUS.

Okay, I'll fold the implementations unless something prevents it (unlikely).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function