From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tossati <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heinz Graalfs <graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Konstantin Weitz <WEITZKON@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm-s390: Implement the directed yield (diag 9c) hypervisor call for KVM
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:19:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F993D51.3000706@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22DEE55A-B849-4530-A522-ED5D034C8506@suse.de>
>> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tcpu, kvm)
>> + if (tcpu->vcpu_id == tid) {
>
> Wouldn't
>
> kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, tid)
>
> be what you want here?
Would be better in terms of scalability, but we can do that
only if kvm->vcpus[i].vcpu_id = i
Is that always the case?
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-26 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-24 7:24 [PATCH 0/3] Fixes and feature for kvm-s390 Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 7:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] kvm-s390: Implement the directed yield (diag 9c) hypervisor call for KVM Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 12:04 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-24 12:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/3v2] " Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 13:06 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-24 15:47 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 16:15 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-24 16:21 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 16:22 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-25 13:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] rework kvm_vcpu_on_spin Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-25 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] kvm-s390: Implement the directed yield (diag 9c) hypervisor call for KVM Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-26 12:06 ` Alexander Graf
2012-04-26 12:19 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2012-04-26 12:26 ` Alexander Graf
2012-04-25 13:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] kvm-s390: use kvm_vcpu_on_spin for diag 0x44 Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-29 11:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] rework kvm_vcpu_on_spin Avi Kivity
2012-06-06 12:55 ` trace points and ABI Christian Borntraeger
2012-06-06 13:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-24 7:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] kvm-s390: Handle sckpf instruction Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 7:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: implement KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 12:06 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-24 12:47 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-04-24 13:01 ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-01 0:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-05-01 1:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-05-02 8:50 ` [PATCH 0/1] Updated Patch for NR/MAX VCPU on s390 Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-02 8:50 ` [PATCH 1/1] kvm-s390x: implement KVM_CAP_NR/MAX_VCPUS Christian Borntraeger
2012-05-02 21:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F993D51.3000706@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=WEITZKON@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox