From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] KVM: Reduce mmu_lock contention during dirty logging by cond_resched() Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:00:03 +0300 Message-ID: <4F9D5773.4090505@redhat.com> References: <20120428190544.7dc2bfd281054c1fcac5a14e@gmail.com> <20120428190754.5c27325da5663e5d8c9b9be1@gmail.com> <4F9D25A2.7020303@redhat.com> <20120429211759.0265df80d7193048344ff35b@gmail.com> <4F9D3B26.7090602@redhat.com> <20120429232407.684da454a0862f121754a126@gmail.com> <4F9D52A7.8020105@redhat.com> <20120429235550.856ff62eff954caf9ea739b5@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp To: Takuya Yoshikawa Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5564 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753008Ab2D2PAL (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:00:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120429235550.856ff62eff954caf9ea739b5@gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/29/2012 05:55 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:39:35 +0300 > Avi Kivity wrote: > > > > How about your own idea? > > > > > > > Looks pretty good, if I do say so myself. I'll take a shot at > > implementing it. > > > Looking forward to it! > After your work, 8192 in my patch may better be lowered a bit. > Why not remove it altogether? Just change it to cond_resched_lock(). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function