From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Remove stale values from ctxt->memop before emulation
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 11:21:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA634A0.8020504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336148056-15662-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>
On 05/04/2012 07:14 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> When instruction decoding begins there could be stale values
> in the ctxt->memop structure. This causes problems when an
> instruction is emulated with more op-bytes then the guest
> wants (like the bsr instruction which is always emulated
> with 4 or 8 op-bytes).
>
> The stale value in this structure causes the unit-test for
> the bsrw instruction to fail. Initialize the memop.val with
> 0 to prevent such bugs (an alternative fix could be to
> always emulate instructions with the number of op-bytes
> requested by the guest).
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index d4bf50c..1b516ec 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -3937,6 +3937,7 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len)
> struct opcode opcode;
>
> ctxt->memop.type = OP_NONE;
> + ctxt->memop.val = 0;
> ctxt->memopp = NULL;
> ctxt->_eip = ctxt->eip;
> ctxt->fetch.start = ctxt->_eip;
This only works for long sized values - it doesn't initialize val64 on
i386, for example. So I think it's better to change bsr (and family) to
use emualte_2op_SrcV_nobyte() instead (which has the added benefit of
using the same values as the processor for the "undefined" bits).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-06 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-04 16:14 [PATCH] KVM: X86: Remove stale values from ctxt->memop before emulation Joerg Roedel
2012-05-06 8:21 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-05-07 10:12 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-05-07 10:18 ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-07 10:43 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-05-14 8:32 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA634A0.8020504@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox